<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.9.2 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:37:28 GMT--><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rss="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"><rss:channel rdf:about="http://www.reasoningright.com/frontpage/"><rss:title>Frontpage</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.reasoningright.com/frontpage/</rss:link><rss:description></rss:description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><dc:date>2010-03-09T20:37:28Z</dc:date><admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.squarespace.com/">Squarespace Site Server v5.9.2 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</admin:generatorAgent><rss:items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reasoningright.com/frontpage/2009/3/12/privatizing-roads.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reasoningright.com/frontpage/2009/3/10/john-allison-on-the-financial-crisis.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reasoningright.com/frontpage/2009/3/6/healthcare-in-sweden.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reasoningright.com/frontpage/2009/3/2/dont-be-evil.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reasoningright.com/frontpage/2009/3/2/flying-blind.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reasoningright.com/frontpage/2009/1/24/dont-break-the-record.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reasoningright.com/frontpage/2009/1/7/defending-israel-is-defending-freedom.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reasoningright.com/frontpage/2008/12/28/the-cost-of-fraud.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reasoningright.com/frontpage/2008/12/17/reasoning-right-about-the-minimum-wage.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reasoningright.com/frontpage/2008/12/13/all-good-things.html"/></rdf:Seq></rss:items></rss:channel><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.reasoningright.com/frontpage/2009/3/12/privatizing-roads.html"><rss:title>Privatizing Roads</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.reasoningright.com/frontpage/2009/3/12/privatizing-roads.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Mr. Right</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-03-12T21:36:01Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Services such as highway infrastructure and public utilities are often owned by the government.&nbsp; The government maintains a coercive monopoly over these sectors of the economy by barring private companies from entering the field or by regulating private companies to the extent that the companies are not free to act in their own self interest.&nbsp; Some results of government controlled infrastructure include crumbling roads, traffic jams, and power shortages.&nbsp;&nbsp; When these areas of the economy are government run and government owned, there is no incentive to improve services and innovation is rare.&nbsp;&nbsp; The privatization of these sectors of the economy is a topic deserving of more attention.&nbsp; This is especially true given the President's focus on renewing investment in 'public infrastructure' by rebuilding roads.&nbsp; A recent article by John Stossel brings to light the many benefits of road privatization as well as the inefficiencies (and occassional deaths) that result from government control of infrastructure.&nbsp; A great read.&nbsp; Click <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Stossel/Story?id=7057982&amp;page=1" target="_blank">here </a>for the article.</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.reasoningright.com/frontpage/2009/3/10/john-allison-on-the-financial-crisis.html"><rss:title>John Allison on The Financial Crisis</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.reasoningright.com/frontpage/2009/3/10/john-allison-on-the-financial-crisis.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Mr. Right</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-03-10T15:00:45Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On January 29, 2009, The Ayn Rand Center hosted a talk by BB&amp;T chairman and CEO John Allison.&nbsp; The talk focused on the true causes of the financial crisis and the government's misguided efforts to cure the crisis.&nbsp; The lecture has recently been posted by ARC and can be found <a href="http://www.aynrand.org/site/PageServer?pagename=reg_ls_financial_crisis" target="_blank">here</a>.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Conclusion from the lecture:&nbsp; The government played a large role in causing this crisis; the government is making the crisis worse by intervening in the economy now.</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.reasoningright.com/frontpage/2009/3/6/healthcare-in-sweden.html"><rss:title>Healthcare in Sweden...</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.reasoningright.com/frontpage/2009/3/6/healthcare-in-sweden.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Mr. Right</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-03-06T19:52:53Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweden is often hailed by many to be a socialist democratic mecca.&nbsp; One of the features of Sweden's government is "universal" or "socialized" healthcare.&nbsp;&nbsp; It's no secret that universal healthcare has been a dismal failure in all countries where it is instituted.&nbsp; Sweden is no exception.&nbsp; This new article brings to light some of the more dismal aspects of Sweden's particular brand of universal healthcare.&nbsp; A great read.&nbsp; Click <a href="http://www.capmag.com/article.asp?ID=5451" target="_blank">here</a> for the article.</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.reasoningright.com/frontpage/2009/3/2/dont-be-evil.html"><rss:title>Don't Be Evil</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.reasoningright.com/frontpage/2009/3/2/dont-be-evil.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Mr. Right</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-03-02T19:09:42Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[The phrase "Don’t Be Evil" is Google Inc.’s corporate motto.  The slogan was reportedly created by Paul Buchheit and Amit Patel (the creators of Gmail) who stated that the catch phrase is a "bit of a jab at a lot of the other companies, especially our competitors, who at the time, in our opinion, were kind of exploiting the users to some extent."  Google has become a fierce competitor of Microsoft in the search engine market and web based email market.  The new products that Google brings to the market place is convincing evidence that despite Microsoft’s size and strength, there is always room for new companies to competitively offer consumers new products which are cheaper, better, and more enjoyable to use.  The only requirement for competitive success is to allow companies like Google and Microsoft the freedom to sell their own products on their own terms.  It is hard to deny that Google has been a ‘good’ company by creating programs that are better than their competitors.  However, Google has recently violated its motto by intervening as a third party in support of a European Union antitrust complaint against Microsoft.  In supporting the European Union’s attempt to disallow Microsoft from selling its own products on its own terms (i.e. to bundle Internet Explorer with the Windows operating system), Google is engaging in anti-competitive behavior.  Google is attempting to get an unfair advantage, not by creating better products, but through government pull and coercion.]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.reasoningright.com/frontpage/2009/3/2/flying-blind.html"><rss:title>Flying Blind</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.reasoningright.com/frontpage/2009/3/2/flying-blind.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Mr. Right</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-03-02T02:36:29Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[On February 25, 2009, President Barak Obama addressed both houses of Congress and the nation in the functional equivalent of a State of the Union Address.  The President started off by reviewing the factors which caused the current economic crisis.  He then outlined his plan for America and detailed the means necessary to realize his new vision.  In looking back at history, he has blurred the facts, and in looking forward, he is flying blind.  A clear analysis of the president’s speech shows that Obama’s explanation of the cause of the recession and his proposed solutions are full of contradictions, economic fallacies, and a false view of history.]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.reasoningright.com/frontpage/2009/1/24/dont-break-the-record.html"><rss:title>Don't Break The Record</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.reasoningright.com/frontpage/2009/1/24/dont-break-the-record.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Mr. Right</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-01-25T00:16:37Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[The true purpose of a competitive sport is to strive for the highest achievement possible within the boundaries of the rules which govern the game.  Achievement in competitive sports is a virtue that strengthens the self esteem of the achiever and inspires confidence in those who are witness to the achievement.  The resultant happiness felt by players and spectators alike lifts the spirit and affirms the efficacy of man’s ego.]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.reasoningright.com/frontpage/2009/1/7/defending-israel-is-defending-freedom.html"><rss:title>Defending Israel is Defending Freedom</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.reasoningright.com/frontpage/2009/1/7/defending-israel-is-defending-freedom.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Mr. Right</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-01-07T04:33:21Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[The recent breakdown of the ceasefire between Hamas and Israel on November 5, 2008 resulted in hundreds of rocket attacks on Israeli civilians.  Israel responded to these attacks by launching air strikes and beginning a ground incursion into Gaza as of January 2, 2009.  Israel’s mission is to route out militants, cripple Hamas’s ability to launch further terrorist attacks, and destroy weapons stock piles.  This battle is the latest in a longstanding conflict between Israel and those who speak for the Palestinians. The views held and expressed by America’s next president on this conflict will play an important role in brokering a peace.  It is therefore crucial for president elect Barack Obama to reason right about the fundamental issues underlying the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.  In order for any future negotiations to be successful, president elect Obama must realize that the Israelis and the Hamas led Palestinians are not equal when it comes to their moral philosophy of self-governance and their methods for achieving it.  Israel values freedom and exists to protect the individual rights of its citizens.  Hamas seeks to obliterate Israel and establish a theocratic dictatorship inconsistent with rights or freedom.  President elect Obama must come to terms with this difference in order to defend freedom and combat terrorism.]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.reasoningright.com/frontpage/2008/12/28/the-cost-of-fraud.html"><rss:title>The Cost of Fraud</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.reasoningright.com/frontpage/2008/12/28/the-cost-of-fraud.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Mr. Right</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-12-28T07:13:05Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[On December 11, 2008, businessman and financier Bernard Madoff was arrested in his New York City apartment and charged with securities fraud.  The fraud consisted of a massive ‘ponzi scheme’ whereby Madoff’s hedge fund used newly acquired funds to repay earlier investors.  The scheme spanned thirty years, during which time Madoff acquired large sums of personal wealth and positions of stature.  The scheme ended in 2008 when Madoff confessed to his sons that the fund no longer had sufficient assets to cover new requests for withdrawals.  Madoff’s fraudulent investment scheme resulted in the loss of 50 billion dollars, which has laid devastation not only on individual investors, but also on charitable institutions like the Elie Wiesel Foundation who trusted Madoff with their money.  Madoff will likely lose all of his personal wealth as a result of his crime, and will also (hopefully) go to prison.  At first glance, mere imprisonment seems woefully inadequate to account for the pain Madoff caused to so many institutions and individuals around the world.  However, those who reason right about fraud know that in committing fraud, the greatest loss is incurred by the defrauder himself.]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.reasoningright.com/frontpage/2008/12/17/reasoning-right-about-the-minimum-wage.html"><rss:title>Reasoning Right About The Minimum Wage</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.reasoningright.com/frontpage/2008/12/17/reasoning-right-about-the-minimum-wage.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Mr. Right</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-12-17T05:36:29Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[The minimum wage was originally created as part of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 under President Franklin Roosevelt.  Since that time, Congress has periodically raised the minimum wage in the sixties, seventies, and eighties.  The minimum wage will be increased in 2009 to $7.25 an hour and President Elect Barack Obama plans to raise the minimum wage again in 2011 to $9.50 an hour. According to one source, 80% of the American people are in favor of increasing the minimum wage. Supporters of the minimum wage argue that workers (especially low skilled workers) have a right to a livable wage, that the personal dignity of the worker is at stake, that the minimum wage ‘frees’ workers from depending on the government for subsidizing the wages of their employers, that a higher minimum wage will foster higher morale among employees, and that it will enable a sense of greater loyalty toward employers. The arguments in support of the minimum wage are numerous. However, none of the above arguments take into consideration the employer’s freedom and moral right to set the terms of employment for his own business. From an ethical standpoint, the minimum wage is therefore a violation of an individual’s right to freedom of contract. From a practical standpoint, a government mandated minimum wage is equally as deplorable as it invariably worsens the very problem it was designed to remedy.]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.reasoningright.com/frontpage/2008/12/13/all-good-things.html"><rss:title>All Good Things</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.reasoningright.com/frontpage/2008/12/13/all-good-things.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Mr. Right</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-12-13T17:51:03Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[There is a saying that "All good things must come to an end."  News headlines increasingly foretell the end of capitalism in America and the increased nationalization and socialization of the economy. Multiple large scale government interventions have already taken place, including the bailout of Bear Sterns, the $700 billion TARP bailout, and the bailout of insurance giant AIG. President Elect Barack Obama has additional long term plans for the economy including massively expanding the role of government in providing health care, creating a new $700 billion dollar public jobs creation stimulus package, and most recently supporting a $14 billion dollar auto bailout which would result in the appointment of a car czar to oversee production and regulate how America buys and sells cars. In the interim, the federal reserve continues to make massive loans to keep unnamed private interests solvent, including a recent mystery loan totaling over two trillion dollars.]]></content:encoded></rss:item></rdf:RDF>